The ntpd “pool” option has been working well since ntp-dev 4.2.7p249 in January of 2012, over a decade ago. It didn’t hit ntp-stable until 4.2.8 in December of 2014. It has been in NTPsec since the project began in 2015. This is a better option for both users and pool server operators than multiple…

This would be done through a pull request in the website code repository. Such a pull request already exists: Update HowTo on using the pool by penguinpee · Pull Request #218 · abh/ntppool · GitHub

Yes, but my lack of markup skills make that first one have a very ugly example ntp.conf compared to this one. I did comment several times on the github pull request. I just hope someone finally updates the how to use the pool instructions to point to the much better way for users and server operat…

That first one was flagged as spam by several folks undoubtedly due to the unintentional screaming, so was hidden. I reposted here and would be fine with hiding the other one if I knew how.

Hi, NTP Pool is effectively a one man band as far as making changes goes, so the chances of getting anything done, however sensible and appropriate, before the next ice age is as close to zero as makes no difference…! [image] Newbie question regarding zone assignments and the beta …

[image] elljay: NTP Pool is effectively a one man band as far as making changes goes Dependency [image] Someday ImageMagick will finally break for good and we'll have a long period of scrambling as we try to reassemble civilization from the rubble. We n…

A “bus factor” of 1 is a serious information security concern. No project in that state has ever passed any of the security audits I’ve done. It’s a concern on its own, but it makes other critical security practices impossible (separation of privileges, encryption key management, ransomware remediat…

From Wikipedia "The “bus factor” is the minimum number of team members that have to suddenly disappear from a project before the project stalls due to lack of knowledgeable or competent personnel. " I would say the NTP pool has been in this state for years ---- but the scattered DNS servers not so …

Happy to help improve things, but as I said in the other thread I’ve tried to raise the issue with @ask in private and then in public many times, but I get no response. Zero, nada, nothing… It’s very embarrassing to see the emails from vendors behind the scenes saying “Hey my project is going live…

One man shows seem to be the norm with NTP.

Recommend the superior “pool" not “server” in ntp.conf

Server operators

kenyon November 25, 2022, 8:29pm 3

I see now that this is a duplicate of Please recommend the decade-old "pool" command not "server" in ntp.conf

Topic		Replies	Views
Should the How to Use pools page be updated with an option that uses 'pool' instead of 'server'? Client Configuration and Development	4	1120	August 16, 2023
Testing needed for ntpd pool change to whittle outliers Client Configuration and Development dns	24	1547	June 21, 2023
Change 'server' directive into 'pool' directive in use.html Forum Site Feedback	0	565	April 17, 2021
Making traffic to decommissioned pool servers stop sooner Server operators dns	12	1027	July 3, 2023
FYI: removing server from the pool Client Configuration and Development	7	1117	June 6, 2022

Recommend the superior “pool" not “server” in ntp.conf

Related topics