That would make sense and confirm what others reported here, that a monitor likely visits all servers in the world.
And the algorithm is mostly correct, selecting monitors in the same or neighboring countries, as they’ll tend to reach the top score for a stable server more consistently due to shorter RTT.
Yeah, I added the “paused” mode so the system can "pause” monitors that are extremely unlikely to ever be selected as testing or active, but right now eventually all monitors will monitor all servers.
Glad to see that your observation is that the “best” (best-ish?) monitors eventually are selected. I’m sure it’s not working perfectly, but the goal is just to have it be good enough that poor monitor selection doesn’t cause poor results.
I agree with some of the other discussion (maybe another thread?) that with the system as it is now, maybe we could have the monitors “fail” a test if any packets are lost (with a count of how many were lost in the data).