# IPv6 enablement

**URL:** <https://community.ntppool.org/t/ipv6-enablement/1428>\
**Category:** Server operators\
**Created:** [September 24, 2019, 1:45pm UTC](https://community.ntppool.org/t/ipv6-enablement/1428 "2019-09-24T13:45:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wildylion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/a587f6/32.png) [@wildylion](https://community.ntppool.org/u/wildylion)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2019, 1:45pm UTC](https://community.ntppool.org/t/ipv6-enablement/1428/1 "2019-09-24T13:45:10Z")

</div>

Hi there.

I added an IPv6 server to the pool, but I can’t find AAAA records on either {ru,europe,0,us,de}.pool.ntp.org.

Am I right that right now IPv6 records simply don’t get served to clients?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![littlejason99](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/community.ntppool.org/littlejason99/32/242_2.png) [@littlejason99](https://community.ntppool.org/u/littlejason99)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2019, 5:36pm UTC](https://community.ntppool.org/t/ipv6-enablement/1428/2 "2019-09-24T17:36:47Z")

</div>

IPv6 is served on the 2.(xxx).pool.ntp.org queries only. It was done initially to allow IPv6 servers to be added to the pool without overwhelming them.

Example:

$ host [2.europe.pool.ntp.org](http://2.europe.pool.ntp.org)

[2.europe.pool.ntp.org](http://2.europe.pool.ntp.org) has address 185.82.232.254  
[2.europe.pool.ntp.org](http://2.europe.pool.ntp.org) has address 147.231.100.5  
[2.europe.pool.ntp.org](http://2.europe.pool.ntp.org) has address 193.70.90.148  
[2.europe.pool.ntp.org](http://2.europe.pool.ntp.org) has address 193.219.61.120  
[2.europe.pool.ntp.org](http://2.europe.pool.ntp.org) has IPv6 address 2a02:2290::16  
[2.europe.pool.ntp.org](http://2.europe.pool.ntp.org) has IPv6 address 2a02:2a08:102::220  
[2.europe.pool.ntp.org](http://2.europe.pool.ntp.org) has IPv6 address 2a01:4f8:162:548a::2  
[2.europe.pool.ntp.org](http://2.europe.pool.ntp.org) has IPv6 address 2001:1600:4:1::123

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NTPman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/community.ntppool.org/ntpman/32/450_2.png) [@NTPman](https://community.ntppool.org/u/NTPman)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2019, 6:20am UTC](https://community.ntppool.org/t/ipv6-enablement/1428/3 "2019-09-25T06:20:10Z")

</div>

> [@littlejason99](#):
>
> IPv6 is served on the 2.(xxx).pool.ntp.org queries only. It was done initially to allow IPv6 servers to be added to the pool without overwhelming them.

Isn’t there any plan to add AAAA records to one more name, like [1.pool.ntp.org](http://1.pool.ntp.org) too? Two names (0 and 3) would still have only A record. That is a smooth move towards full support of IPv6.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![littlejason99](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/community.ntppool.org/littlejason99/32/242_2.png) [@littlejason99](https://community.ntppool.org/u/littlejason99)\
**Post date:** [September 25, 2019, 12:27pm UTC](https://community.ntppool.org/t/ipv6-enablement/1428/4 "2019-09-25T12:27:53Z")

</div>

> [@NTPman](#):
>
> Isn’t there any plan to add AAAA records to one more name, like [1.pool.ntp.org](http://1.pool.ntp.org) too? Two names (0 and 3) would still have only A record. That is a smooth move towards full support of IPv6.

@Ask is in control of that. There has been talk about it, and I’m sure it’s on his list of things “To-Do”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marco.davids](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/community.ntppool.org/marco.davids/32/767_2.png) [@marco.davids](https://community.ntppool.org/u/marco.davids)\
**Post date:** [July 22, 2021, 9:50pm UTC](https://community.ntppool.org/t/ipv6-enablement/1428/5 "2021-07-22T21:50:18Z")

</div>

Hi, I was wondering; is there any news on this? 🤔

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bas](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/community.ntppool.org/bas/32/465_2.png) [@Bas](https://community.ntppool.org/u/Bas)\
**Post date:** [July 26, 2021, 5:18pm UTC](https://community.ntppool.org/t/ipv6-enablement/1428/6 "2021-07-26T17:18:37Z")

</div>

Come on please, are you only here to push the failed IPv6?  
Every topic you open or re-open is about IPv6.

Nobody cares about IPv6, trust me, nobody does.

IPv6 will die soon if they don’t re-think it, as it’s impossible to implement unless you smoked weed or used some crack.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marco.davids](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/community.ntppool.org/marco.davids/32/767_2.png) [@marco.davids](https://community.ntppool.org/u/marco.davids)\
**Post date:** [July 26, 2021, 6:37pm UTC](https://community.ntppool.org/t/ipv6-enablement/1428/7 "2021-07-26T18:37:14Z")

</div>

> [@Bas](#):
>
> Come on please

It is not my fault that there are quite a few topics about IPv6, so please don’t blame it on me.

> [@](#):
>
> Nobody cares about IPv6

Given the amount of IPv6-topics here that seems not entirely true.
