# Diving into the NTP pool (paper)

**URL:** https://community.ntppool.org/t/diving-into-the-ntp-pool-paper/2307
**Category:** Pool Development
**Created:** [February 28, 2022, 3:59pm UTC](https://community.ntppool.org/t/diving-into-the-ntp-pool-paper/2307 "2022-02-28T15:59:43Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![marco.davids](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/community.ntppool.org/marco.davids/32/767_2.png) [@marco.davids](https://community.ntppool.org/u/marco.davids)
#### Post date: [March 8, 2022, 12:31pm UTC](https://community.ntppool.org/t/diving-into-the-ntp-pool-paper/2307/21 "2022-03-08T12:31:17Z")

</div>

> [@NTPman](#):
>
> We should put in place some plan for the phase-out of IPv4, at least in the context of NTPpool.

The NTP pool is pre-eminently a service that should support both protocols for a long time to come. So let’s focus on adding those AAAA-records while keeping the A’s.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![NTPman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/community.ntppool.org/ntpman/32/450_2.png) [@NTPman](https://community.ntppool.org/u/NTPman)
#### Post date: [March 8, 2022, 12:39pm UTC](https://community.ntppool.org/t/diving-into-the-ntp-pool-paper/2307/22 "2022-03-08T12:39:07Z")

</div>

> [@HAHAHAHA](#):
>
> The Pool is not powerful enough to push the change and this is not The Pool’s work.
> 
> It’s really up to tech giants e.g. Microsoft and Google to propel the change.

I think we may debate on that but it is not important here. (I think everybody’s work, big tech’s, ISP’s, infrastructure providers [root&tld DNS, NTPpool], and so on.)

The main point is, that the IPv6 was invented _in replacement of_ and not _in addition to_ the IPv4 protocol. The start point is IPv4 only Internet (one side of the hill), the end point (goal: the other side of the hill) is the IPv6 only Internet. Everybody must be clear with the objective, see clearly the goal and move towards it, as it is possible.

> [@marco.davids](#):
>
> The NTP pool is pre-eminently a service that should support both protocols for a long time to come. So let’s focus on adding those AAAA-records while keeping the A’s.

Good enough starting point. As I mentioned, I was exaggerating.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bas](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/community.ntppool.org/bas/32/465_2.png) [@Bas](https://community.ntppool.org/u/Bas)
#### Post date: [March 8, 2022, 6:26pm UTC](https://community.ntppool.org/t/diving-into-the-ntp-pool-paper/2307/23 "2022-03-08T18:26:24Z")

</div>

> [@grifferz](#):
>
> If there’s anything I have learned over the years here, it’s that it’s totally pointless “debating” Bas on the subject of IPv6. He has a relentless need to post nonsense about it even in threads like this one which had nothing whatsoever to do with IPv6 before he brought it up. I think his father was killed by a 128-bit integer, and he has never gotten over it.

Funny from somebody that never posts.

[Previous page](https://community.ntppool.org/t/diving-into-the-ntp-pool-paper/2307.md?page=1)
